Sunday : May 11, 2025
02 : 12 : 37 AM
Breaking News

PM Shehbaz Sharif applauds the ceasefire agreement as the Pakistani army targets Indian cities.

The Allahabad High Court's "grabbing breasts not rape" decision is overturned by the Supreme Court due to "insensitivity."

top-news


In a significant and much-needed intervention, the **Supreme Court of India** has stayed a controversial ruling by the **Allahabad High Court**, which had controversially held that **groping a woman’s breasts without “skin-to-skin contact” does not amount to rape** under the **Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act**. The apex court strongly criticized the high court’s interpretation, calling it **“insensitive”** and **“outrageous,”** reinforcing the need for a more victim-centric approach in sexual assault cases.  

 **Background of the Controversial Ruling**  
The case originated from a **2018 incident** in Maharashtra, where a **39-year-old man** was accused of sexually assaulting a **12-year-old girl** by pressing her breasts and attempting to remove her clothes. The **Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench)** initially ruled in **January 2021** that since the accused did not remove the girl’s clothes or make direct skin-to-skin contact, his actions did not constitute **“sexual assault” under POCSO** but rather a lesser offense under **Section 354 (outraging modesty) of the IPC**.  

This interpretation was challenged, leading the **Supreme Court to overturn the Bombay HC’s verdict** in **November 2021**, stating that **any sexual intent behind touching a child’s body, even without skin contact, amounts to sexual assault under POCSO**.  

However, in a **shocking parallel**, the **Allahabad High Court** recently delivered a similar verdict in another case, stating that **grabbing a woman’s breasts without direct skin contact does not qualify as rape** under **Section 375 of the IPC**. This ruling sparked nationwide outrage, with women’s rights activists, legal experts, and the general public condemning it as **regressive and dangerous**.  

 **Supreme Court’s Stern Response**  
Taking **suo motu cognizance** of the Allahabad HC’s judgment, the **Supreme Court stayed the ruling**, calling it **“unprecedented and unacceptable.”** The bench, headed by **Chief Justice DY Chandrachud**, emphasized that **sexual assault cannot be trivialized based on technicalities like skin contact**. The court stressed that such interpretations **undermine the gravity of sexual violence** and **re-traumatize survivors** by subjecting them to humiliating legal standards.  

 **Why the Ruling Was Problematic**  
1. **Misinterpretation of Sexual Assault Laws** – The **POCSO Act and IPC Section 375** define sexual assault based on **intent and violation of bodily autonomy**, not just physical contact. The Allahabad HC’s ruling ignored this principle.  
2. **Sets a Dangerous Precedent** – If upheld, such verdicts could embolden offenders to exploit legal loopholes, arguing that **groping or molestation without skin contact is a minor offense**.  
3. **Victim-Blaming & Insensitivity** – The judgment reflected a **deeply patriarchal mindset**, suggesting that only the most extreme forms of assault qualify as rape, while other violations are “less serious.”  

*Public and Legal Fraternity’s Reaction**  
Women’s rights groups, including the **National Commission for Women (NCW)**, hailed the **Supreme Court’s intervention**, calling it a **victory for gender justice**. Legal experts argued that **sexual violence must be judged by its impact on survivors, not technicalities**.  

*What Next?**  
The **Supreme Court will now examine the case in detail**, likely reinforcing its earlier stance that **any non-consensual sexual act—regardless of skin contact—constitutes assault**. This decision will have far-reaching implications, ensuring that **India’s judiciary remains sensitive to survivors of sexual violence** rather than offering leniency based on absurd technical grounds.  

**Conclusion**  
The **Supreme Court’s swift action** sends a strong message: **sexual violence cannot be minimized or justified**. By staying the Allahabad HC’s ruling, the apex court has reaffirmed its commitment to **protecting women’s dignity and ensuring justice**—a crucial step in India’s ongoing battle against gender-based violence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Category

Gallery

  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery

Tags

Social Media

Related Posts

top-news

PM Shehbaz Sharif applauds the ceasefire agreement as the Pakistani army targets Indian cities.

top-news

After the ceasefire agreement with Pakistan, the Indian military said, "Ceasefire on, but..."

top-news

Shashi Tharoor on the truce with Pakistan: "India wanted to teach terrorists a lesson."